The GeForce GTX 960 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $462.95 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Up to 67% cheaper – $229.73 vs $692.68
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 120 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
51%
Min 1% FPS
25
41%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, €
€692.68
33%
Value, €/FPS
€6.41/FPS
65%
Buy on Amazon
€692.68
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€710.70
In Stock
GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 960 vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
27%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
37.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
75.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
2.413 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |