Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms GeForce GTX 765M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 is 3400 days newer than GeForce GTX 765M.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 765M
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 - 75 vs 450 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4090
- Performs up to 389% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 765M - 225 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 24 vs 2 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2585.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,585.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
13.81 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
55.23 GTexel/s
4%
Desktop • Sep 20th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 765M | vs | GeForce RTX 4090 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 20th, 2022 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1599 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 24 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s |
797 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2235 MHz |
863 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2520 MHz |
1002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1313 MHz |