The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 1 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 31 vs 110 Watts
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Average FPS
45
100%
Min 1% FPS
18
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Buy on Amazon
€79.30
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€63.04
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€62.36
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€117.11
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€61.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€108.10
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€97.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€64.55
In Stock
GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Oct 9th, 2012
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.85 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
59.39 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.425 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
7%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
3%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 9th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 110 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
14.85 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
59.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
1.425 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
