The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $646.81 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- Up to 91% cheaper – $62.16 vs $708.97
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 170 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Average FPS
41
49%
Min 1% FPS
16
36%
Price, €
€62.16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€708.97
8%
Value, €/FPS
€8.44/FPS
18%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Jan 25th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
27%
Pixel Fillrate
13.17 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
52.67 GTexel/s
14%
FP32
1.263 TFLOPS
10%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
$249.00 | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
170 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 128.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 13.17 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 52.67 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 1.263 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
