The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 65 vs 210 Watts
- Up to 220% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Nov 29th, 2011
Average FPS
42
86%
Min 1% FPS
17
81%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, €
€124.32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Nov 29th, 2011
Memory
1.25 GB
31%
Memory Bandwidth
152 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
20.5 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
40.99 GTexel/s
99%
FP32
1.312 TFLOPS
79%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 29th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| $289.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 210 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1.25 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 320-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
152 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20.5 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| 40.99 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| 1.312 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
