The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 550 Ti
The Radeon RX 550 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 50 vs 116 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Mar 15th, 2011
Average FPS
40
85%
Min 1% FPS
15
75%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
100%
Min 1% FPS
20
100%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€189.18
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€72.06
In Stock
GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Mar 15th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
98.5 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
7.2 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
76%
FP32
691.2 GFLOPS
57%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 550 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 15th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | $79.00 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 116 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 98.5 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
| 28.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
| 691.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
