The GeForce GTX 465 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 465
- Consumes up to 2% less energy – 200 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 465
May 31st, 2010
Average FPS
40
41%
Min 1% FPS
15
28%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, €
€234.23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 465
May 31st, 2010
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
102.7 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
13.38 GPixel/s
11%
Texture Fillrate
26.75 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
855.4 GFLOPS
10%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 465 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
200 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 102.7 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 13.38 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 26.75 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 855.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
