Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 outperforms Radeon R7 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 is 1983 days newer than Radeon R7 240.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1660
- Performs up to 86% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R7 240 - 80 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of Radeon R7 240
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 - 30 vs 120 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
43
54%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 456 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 14th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 | vs | Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$219 | MSRP | $69 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
1530 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1785 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |