The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $178.52 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 48% cheaper – $190.85 vs $369.37
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 75 vs 120 Watts
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€369.37
51%
Value, €/FPS
€4.45/FPS
82%
Buy on Amazon
€369.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
63%
Min 1% FPS
23
52%
Price, €
€190.85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€190.85
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€166.65
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
24%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
48%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
48%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $279.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
