The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $159.67 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 120 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Up to 51% cheaper – $154.94 vs $314.61
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, €
€314.61
49%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
62%
Buy on Amazon
€314.61
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€315.31
In Stock
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
80%
Min 1% FPS
32
73%
Price, €
€154.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
95%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
95%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
78%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
