The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is better in every way
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
69%
Min 1% FPS
23
61%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.101 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
62%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
66%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
66%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
64.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
128.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
4.101 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |
