The GeForce GTX 1650 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090 D. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 75 vs 425 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 D
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
29%
Min 1% FPS
31
22%
Price, €
€314.41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Average FPS
217
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
17%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1149 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
73.54 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 28th, 2023 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 425 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 443.5 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1149 GTexel/s |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 | 73.54 TFLOPS |
