Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 296 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 114 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
103
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €124.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |