Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 275 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 172 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
152
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €124.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
54%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |