The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a slightly faster gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $101.81 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 21% cheaper – $374.77 vs $476.58
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 70 vs 180 Watts
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
100%
Min 1% FPS
47
100%
Price, €
€476.58
78%
Value, €/FPS
€5.47/FPS
82%
Buy on Amazon
€476.58
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€477.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€810.80
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€438.73
In Stock
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
97%
Min 1% FPS
45
96%
Price, €
€374.77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.46/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
99%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
67%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
74%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 107.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
255.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
| 8.186 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
