The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 9100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 120 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 9100
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aug 15th, 2016
Average FPS
78
93%
Min 1% FPS
41
91%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
45
100%
Price, €
€708.97
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.44/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 9100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Aug 15th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
105.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
210.6 GTexel/s
55%
FP32
6.738 TFLOPS
55%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Jul 10th, 2017
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
91%
Texture Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.29 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 15th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 256.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
105.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 96 GPixel/s |
| 210.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 384 GTexel/s |
| 6.738 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.29 TFLOPS |
