The GeForce GT 650M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 650M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 45 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 650M
Mar 22nd, 2012
Average FPS
41
46%
Min 1% FPS
16
33%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, €
€426.08
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.73/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 650M
Mar 22nd, 2012
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
7.6 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
30.4 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
729.6 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 650M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Vega |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 7.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 30.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 729.6 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
