The GeForce GT 520M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 12 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
93%
Min 1% FPS
14
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
100%
Min 1% FPS
16
100%
Price, €
€67.55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
1.344 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
5.376 GTexel/s
18%
FP32
129 GFLOPS
14%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
12 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.344 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
| 5.376 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
| 129 GFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |
