Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 2060 outperforms GeForce GT 430 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 2060 is 3010 days newer than GeForce GT 430.
Advantages of GeForce GT 430
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 49 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 2060
- Performs up to 3200% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 430 - 33 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 96% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 430 - $5.46 vs $135.14 per FPS
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 - 6 vs 0 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €135.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7342 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
FPS
33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.17
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7341 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 430 | vs | GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
Oct 11th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2019 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | GeForce 20 |
$79 | MSRP | $349 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
0.5 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 336 GB/s |
700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1365 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1680 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |