Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4422 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 23 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 215% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GT 425M - 85 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 8 vs 1 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€249.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €249.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 425M | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |