Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 590 is 3285 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 590 - 69 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of Radeon RX 590
- Performs up to 70% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GT 240 - 75 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 8 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018
FPS
75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 722 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 15th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 240 | vs | Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Polaris |
$80 | MSRP | $279 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1469 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1545 MHz |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |