In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GT 220 is much slower than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 58 vs 250 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Up to 3800% faster in Battlefield 6 – 39 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 3800% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Jun 02, 2015 vs Oct 12, 2009
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 0 GB
- Up to 1100% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
39 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
29 FPS
100%
Price, $
$680
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GT 220 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GT 220
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
8%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
5 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
10 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
130.6 GFLOPS
2%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GT 220 Oct 12th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | GeForce GTX 980 Ti Jun 2nd, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
58 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
