The GeForce 820M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 45 vs 160 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce 820M vs Radeon RX 6600 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 820M
Mar 21st, 2015
Average FPS
39
37%
Min 1% FPS
15
25%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Average FPS
105
100%
Min 1% FPS
59
100%
Price, €
€466.23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€466.23
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€536.04
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€450.44
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
GeForce 820M vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 820M vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 820M vs Radeon RX 6600 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 820M
Mar 21st, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
28.83 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
6.48 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
25.92 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
622.1 GFLOPS
6%
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Jul 30th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.6 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 820M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $379.00 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 160 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.83 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 6.48 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.7 GPixel/s |
| 25.92 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 331.4 GTexel/s |
| 622.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 10.6 TFLOPS |
