The GeForce 710M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6600. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 710M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 15 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 1 GB
GeForce 710M vs Radeon Pro W6600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 710M
Jul 24th, 2013
Average FPS
39
41%
Min 1% FPS
15
29%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6600
Jun 8th, 2021
Average FPS
94
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, €
€277.47
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.95/FPS
100%
GeForce 710M vs Radeon Pro W6600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 710M vs Radeon Pro W6600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 710M vs Radeon Pro W6600 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 710M
Jul 24th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
6%
Pixel Fillrate
6.064 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
12.13 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
291.1 GFLOPS
3%
Radeon Pro W6600
Jun 8th, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
289 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.247 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 710M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6600 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 24th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 8th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
GeForce 700M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
Memory | ||
1 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
6.064 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 165.1 GPixel/s |
12.13 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 289 GTexel/s |
291.1 GFLOPS | FP32 | 9.247 TFLOPS |