The Arc A370M is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
63
98%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, €
€314.41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
87%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
81%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
71%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
71%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |