The Arc A370M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 35 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 175% more VRAM memory – 11 vs 4 GB
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€1341.44
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,341.44
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€449.55
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€611.71
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€539.64
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€873.86
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€539.64
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€611.71
In Stock
Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
36%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
37%
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Mar 10th, 2017
Memory
11 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
484.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
139.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
354.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.34 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $699.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 11 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5X |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 352-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 139.2 GPixel/s |
| 131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 354.4 GTexel/s |
| 4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.34 TFLOPS |
