The Arc A350M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 25 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, €
€426.08
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.73/FPS
100%
Arc A350M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs Radeon RX Vega 64 in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
23%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
27%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Vega |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | HBM2 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 2048-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 98.94 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 395.8 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.66 TFLOPS |
