The Arc A350M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A350M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 25 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€262.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.64/FPS
100%
Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
96%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
77%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
77%
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A350M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
25 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 52.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 55.2 GPixel/s |
| 105.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 138 GTexel/s |
| 3.379 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.416 TFLOPS |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
