Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6400 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6400 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 53 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 11% cheaper than Radeon RX 6400 - $91.6 vs $102.36
- Up to 10% better value when playing Rust than Radeon RX 6400 - $1.04 vs $1.16 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83%
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$159 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1923 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2321 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |