Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 M395X outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 M395X is 504 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395X
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Radeon R7 260 - 93 vs 87 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 75 vs 95 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 8 vs 2 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 M395X
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M395X | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| Crystal System | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
