Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 M390X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1389 days newer than Radeon R9 M390X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 75 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 44% better in World of Tanks than Radeon R9 M390X - 184 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 M390X - 6 vs 4 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€386.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €386.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 5th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
23.14 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
92.54 GTexel/s
54%
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 M390X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
May 5th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
Crystal System | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
723 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |