Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 390 is 717 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 22 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 76 vs 46 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Radeon R9 390 - $54.83 vs $218.63
- Up to 59% better value when playing F1 22 than Radeon R9 390 - $1.32 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390 - 35 vs 275 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €242.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
46
60%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
24%
AMD Radeon R9 390 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$329 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |