Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon R9 290 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R9 290 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R9 290.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Up to 34% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $218.63 vs $329.04
- Up to 32% better value when playing League of Legends than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $0.66 vs $0.97 per FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 2% better in League of Legends than Radeon R9 290 - 376 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 165 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 16 vs 4 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
FPS
368
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €242.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2142 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
376
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
68%
Price, €
€365.23
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$399 | MSRP | $499 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |