Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 290 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R9 290 is 1995 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than GeForce GTX 1650 - 185 vs 183 FPS
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 60% cheaper than Radeon R9 290 - $87.74 vs $218.63
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Radeon R9 290 - $0.53 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290 - 75 vs 275 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €242.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
183
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
87%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
61%
AMD Radeon R9 290 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$399 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
947 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |