Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 3304 days newer than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 322% better in The Last of Us Part I than Radeon R7 260 - 97 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 16 vs 2 GB
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
8.429926238145416%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
9.314962157966233%
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R7 260 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Dec 17th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
$109 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1335 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |