Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 688 days newer than Radeon R7 250.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 55 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 123% better in Fortnite than Radeon R7 250 - 69 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
23.125%
Texel Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
11.5625%
AMD Radeon R7 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |