Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon R5 M240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 16 days older than Radeon R5 M240.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 244% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon R5 M240 - 31 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 M240 - 2 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R5 M240
Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 M240
Mobile • Sep 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
8.24 GPixel/s
28.04628999319265%
Texel Fillrate
20.6 GTexel/s
20.038910505836576%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 M240 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Crystal System | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1030 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
