Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 109 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 39% cheaper than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - $40.21 vs $65.8
- Up to 21% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GTX 750 Ti - $2.63 vs $3.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti - 50 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Performs up to 29% better in Alan Wake 2 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 22 vs 17 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
17
77.27272727272727%
Value, €/FPS
€2.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35463 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
FPS
22
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.32/FPS
79.21686746987952%
Price, €
€73.04
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €73.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
35.944700460829495%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
43.13364055299539%
Desktop • Feb 18th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 18th, 2014 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 700 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1020 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1085 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1350 MHz |