Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250 outperforms the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon R7 250 is 24 days older than the cheaper Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 27% cheaper than Radeon R7 250 - $40.21 vs $54.83
- Up to 22% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Radeon R7 250 - $1.31 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 36 vs 34 FPS
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
34
94.44444444444444%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36163 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
36
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
77.51479289940829%
Price, €
€60.86
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €60.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
42.16216216216216%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
63.24324324324324%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
DDR3 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |