Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 143 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 7% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - $102.36 vs $109.68
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER - 65 vs 100 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Performs up to 42% better in Battlefield V than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 122 vs 86 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74394 minutes ago
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
37.53623188405797%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
30.028985507246375%
Desktop • Nov 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 22nd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$199 | MSRP | $159 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1530 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1725 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |