Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 460 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon RX 460 is 300 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Up to 56% cheaper than Radeon RX 460 - $54.83 vs $125.77
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 460 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 460
- Performs up to 29% better in Control than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 31 vs 24 FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €60.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74258 minutes ago
Buy for €139.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
58.05059523809524%
Desktop • Aug 8th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.2 GPixel/s
98.46153846153845%
Texel Fillrate
67.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 460 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Arctic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1090 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |