Key Differences
In short — Radeon 680M outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon 680M is 1281 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Performs up to 38% better in Remnant II than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 18 vs 13 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 50 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon 680M - 4 vs 0 GB
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
13
72%
Value, €/FPS
€9.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
29%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
39%
AMD Radeon 680M | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Navi II IGP | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |