In Battlefield 6, the Xeon w9-3475X is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon w9-3475X
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Feb 15, 2023 vs Nov 04, 2021
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 125 vs 300 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$291.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon w9-3475X vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon w9-3475X
Feb 15th, 2023
Cores
36-core
100%
L3 Cache
82.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
92%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
44%
L3 Cache
30 MB
36%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon w9-3475X Feb 15th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 15th, 2023 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| $3,739.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA4677 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 300 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
