In Battlefield 6, the Xeon w7-3465X is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon w7-3465X
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 107 vs 104 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Feb 15, 2023 vs Nov 05, 2020
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 105 vs 300 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon w7-3465X vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
98%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon w7-3465X vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon w7-3465X vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon w7-3465X
Feb 15th, 2023
Cores
28-core
100%
L3 Cache
75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
43%
L3 Cache
64 MB
85%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon w7-3465X Feb 15th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 15th, 2023 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| $2,889.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA4677 | Socket | AM4 |
| 300 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
