Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3977 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 192% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon W3690 - 76 vs 26 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3690 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Gulftown | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |