Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4511 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon W3670 - 423 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3670 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |