Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4167 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon W3670 - 181 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 58 vs 130 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W3670 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
