Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-1290 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-1290 is 311 days newer than Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Xeon W-1290
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700X - 431 vs 426 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W-1290 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-1290
Server/Workstation • May 13th, 2020
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-1290 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
