Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 3400 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5620 - 266 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
