Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 707 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 145 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 48 vs 44 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 22 | Cores | 24 |
| 44 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
